This website is an international information resource intended for international healthcare professionals outside the United States of America (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) who are interested in information about Boehringer Ingelheim oncology.
While the Internet serves a global community, the pharmaceutical industry is subject to country-specific regulatory considerations. This means that compound status or the registration status and approved product labels of the products described within this website may not be the same in different countries.
Information about approved products on this website is derived from the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) for each product in the EU. It is not country-specific and may vary from the approved label in the country where you are located. Please refer to your local Prescribing Information for full details.
By clicking on the link below you are declaring and confirming that you are a healthcare professional outside the United States of America and the United Kingdom and have read and understood this disclaimer.
Afatinib and Best Supportive Care vs Placebo and Best Supportive Care in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Failing Erlotinib or Gefitinib
Phase IIb/III, randomised, double-blind trial of afatinib* plus best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib or gefitinib.
Trial CT.gov-Identifier: NCT00656136
Stage IIIB/IV adenocarcinoma of the lung
Progressed after one or two lines of chemotherapy (including one platinum-based regimen) and ≥12 weeks of treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2
Primary outcome measure:
Secondary outcome measures:
Median OS was 10.8 months with afatinib and 12.0 months with placebo; the difference was not statistically significant.
Median PFS was significantly longer with afatinib (3.3 months) than with placebo (1.1 months). Twenty-nine patients (7%) had a confirmed objective response to afatinib by independent review, compared with one partial response in the placebo group.
The most common adverse events for afatinib were:
Although there was no benefit in terms of OS, patients on afatinib showed improvement in PFS and response rate relative to placebo, suggesting that afatinib might be of some benefit to patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma that has progressed after one or two lines of chemotherapy and ≥12 weeks of treatment with either erlotinib and/or gefitinib.
Miller VA, et al. Lancet Oncol 2012;13(5):528–538.
Clinicaltrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00656136 (Accessed: July 2017).
*Afatinib is approved in more than 80 markets including the EU, Japan, Taiwan, and Canada under the brand name GIOTRIF®, in the US under the brand name GILOTRIF® and in India under the brand name Xovoltib®; for the full list please see here. Registration conditions differ internationally; please refer to locally approved prescribing information.
Using this link will let you leave a website of Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (“BI”) or to a different domain under the control of BI. In the event that the linked site is not under the control of BI but under the control of a third party or an affiliate in the Boehringer Ingelheim group of companies, BI shall not be responsible for the contents, processing of personal data of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site, or any changes or updates to such sites. This link is provided to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement by BI of the site.
Do you want to continue ?Continue